PARTNERs (Click Logo)


Special EVENTs

No afternoon game today Fri, Jun 1st
World Wide Pairs Fri, Jun 1st, @6:00pm - 10:00PM
Daytona Regional Mon, Nov 5th
Home

World Wide (!) Pairs Game

Friday Evening, June 1, 6 p.m.
 
Entry Fee: $8, includes book by Eric Kokish
You must sign up at Club, so we can order books

No Afternoon Game, Friday, June 1

logoStratification: What Is It? Print E-mail
Pat Clark   
Friday, December 23, 2011

We all should understand stratification. It's used in most ACBL games, and allows for three sets of winners.

Each of the three strats is a group of pairs with similar levels of experience, as measured by their Masterpoints. Players in the "A" strat can ONLY win Masterpoints by beating other pairs in their own strat. Players in the "B" strat can win Masterpoints by beating other B pairs and by beating A pairs. Players in the "C" strat can win Masterpoints by beating C pairs, and by beating B pairs, and by beating A pairs.

Its like 3 games in one, but the C Pairs play in all 3 games at once, B Pairs play in 2, and A Pairs in only 1. 

Theoretically, "A" pairs gain nothing by beating people in a lower strat. "B" pairs gain nothing by beating people in the "C" strat. "C" pairs gain something by beating people in A, B, or C strats.

Newcomers sometimes don't "get" who they are competing against in Duplicate Bridge, but it is important to always keep in mind when bidding and playing a hand. You must remember that you are not competing against the people sitting at your table! (This is true whether or not the game is stratified.) In a stratified game, all you have to do is play the cards you get better than others with your experience level do, even if just by a little bit.

Why should we always keep this in mind? One obvious reason is the actual score you get for a hand. Let's say you don't think you can make any more than you have already bid and your opponents have outbid you -- should you bid one more? Think what other people holding your cards will do, remembering that you do not have to "make it" to get a good score. If you go down one and score minus 50, and you think others with your skill level will let the opponents play it and score -110, you win! You could even go down 2 tricks for minus 100 and still win. (Note that this is why people hate the minors -- they don't score very well. You can play 4 diamonds extremely well and score 130, while somebody else is playing one less trick in hearts poorly scoring 140, and beat you. Those 10 points make all the difference.)

The other reason is the way a Matchpoint game is scored as a whole. If you beat every pair at your experience level by a mere 10 points, you get a "top" in your strat. On the other hand, if you go down really bad, say minus 1100, on one board, it's not as much a disaster as it seems -- you'll get a "bottom" whether it's by 10 points or 1100 points, and one bad board will not cost you "the match."

So if you do these things better than others at your skill level, you're going to win in a stratified game just as you would in a separate game. Unfortunately, the Recap, printed at the club and shown on The Daily Recap, combines all the winners together and shows the A winners first. So C winners won't often be at the top of the list, but they won anyway. But once in a while, a C pair beats everybody, and it feels very good! You win 3 times in one game and the extra masterpoints to go along with it.

Comments
Search
Pat Clark  - Check out the C winners!   |2011-12-23 08:48:23
Take a look at old Recaps for Thursdays, Fridays, and Mondays (all Open games) looking for C players who did well.

I did -- and found that almost every game had a C Pair doing very well indeed. Several times, a C Pair won it all! (Remember that on Mondays and Fridays, there are winners in both directions and in both sections.)

The A and B players sometimes have such complex systems that they can't handle them any better than a C player can handle his simple system. Also, C players are usually younger and have better/faster minds/memories than the older, more experienced players.
Millie Dabbs  - Thanks, Questions and Greetings   |2011-12-23 09:36:26
Thanks for an excellent explanation of the system.
Questions:
What determines A, B, and C pairs in a game? Say there are 12 A pairs, 2 B pairs and 2 C pairs and the B and C pairs have the lowest scores. Do any of those pairs receive MPs? Does there have to be 3 B pairs and/or 3 C pairs to qualify for MPs if those pairs have the lowest scores and if so, is the lowest A converted to a B or the lowest B converted to a C? If there is a game with all A players (and our club has many players with 1600+ MPs), are those players with the least MPs considered B's or even C's? So many questions, so little time. Merry Christmas!
Pat Clark  - Strats   |2011-12-23 10:29:16
The Directors have the ability and authority to adjust the strats for each game. It's not difficult, but some are uncomfortable with the procedure and use "standard" strats. I don't happen to know what the standard strats are at this time -- they change frequently. With "standard" strats, inequities can be seen, when an unusual mix of pairs shows up to play.

The basic idea is that one-third of the pairs should fall into each strat. So if a bunch of C players show up for an Open game, the cutoffs will be (should be) different (lower) than when a bunch of A players show up.

In my opinion, the Board should require Directors to know how to do this "game by game" stratification, and to do it.

There is another option they have -- strats can be organized by the MPs of the partner having the most, or they can be organized by the average MPs of the pair. This club doesn't use the average method, and I'm not sure how hard it would be to change it.

In any strat, there must be at least 5 pairs for that strat to get MP awards. So if there are only 3 pairs, for example in a strat, then the other strats "collapse" to accommodate the 3.

In some small games, there are not enough pairs to have 5 in each of three strats, so there may only be 2, or even only 1.

Also, Directors are supposed to "balance" the game so that equal numbers of each strat play each direction. Sometimes, like with disabled players who need to sit N/S, this is not possible.
Pat Clark  - What the ACBL says   |2011-12-29 14:36:30
Quoting from the ACBL's Club Director's Handbook:

"One purpose is to give newer players an opportunity to play against the experts (or better players) without it costing them a chance at the points they would have won playing only among themselves. Another is the immediate benefit to all players (and thus to clubs) that the game is larger. Big games get bigger, small games get smaller. The open players are playing for more masterpoints because they are playing in a bigger game. An often overlooked benefit is that there is some protection for the intermediate players who have graduated from the novice game but are not yet competitive with the open players (50-300 MP, for example)."
Only registered users can write comments.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
< Prev   Next >

Statistics

Members: 556
News: 1010
Web Links: 4
Visitors: 841819

Admin Menu