Special EVENTs

St. Pete Sat, Sep 4th
Pot-Luck Picnic Game Mon, Sep 6th
Sunday Swiss Sun, Sep 12th
Beginner Lessons Tue, Sep 14th, @9:30am - 11:30AM
No Game today Wed, Sep 15th
Home arrow Misc arrow Column Archives arrow Alert! Alert
logoAlert! Alert - Spring Hill, Florida - Cuisine Print E-mail
Pat Clark   
Friday, June 26, 2009
Alerts are an important part of Duplicate Bridge, and separate it from all other games, making it the most civilized of all games. When we Alert, we are saying "To be fair, opponents, you should know what we really mean when we bid this way. If you don't know, please ask me, and I'll tell you."

I have witnessed two incidents in the last two days where an Alert was clearly required but not given. As a player, one pair playing with us used a series of bids similar to Precision, with low-level ace-asking bids and other artificial bids at a low level. Last night as Director, a pair was using an unusual variant of Stayman that carried information unknown to the opponents.

We need to remember that there may not be "secret" understandings in this game -- the opponents are entitled to know exactly what your bids mean. Also remember that there is no penalty for Alerting unnecessarily, but there may be penalties for failure to Alert.
One significant problem, is that determining which bids are Alert-able is based on historical usage, stretching back 50 or more years, when most of us were not even born yet. (Right?) Many newer players have no idea how the bidding used to proceed

Some bids are not Alert-able, even though strange and unusual to modern bidders, because they've been in use for a long time. Other bids are Alert-able, because they are new, not so much because they are unusual. Others are unusual in one locality but not another -- it doesn't matter -- any bid which is "highly unusual and unexpected" by historical standards must be alerted.

Perhaps the most unusual non-alert-able bid to a newcomer's ear is the 2NT overcall, also called the "unusual notrump" indicating the bidder holds 2 low ranking suits. A common alert-able bid is 2S over 1NT indicating a transfer request to 3C.

This is not to say that the Alert system does not evolve. Not long ago, 2/1's 2NT response to Partner's minor-suit opening. showing 10-11 HCP, was Alert-able, even though it seems like a perfectly natural jump bid above a 1NT response showing 6-9. This was because in the olden-days, it meant a stronger, game forcing, hand.

The result of all this leads to confusion -- Alerts sometimes seem to be a matter of opinion. The best way out of the confusion is for opponents to call attention to bids which they feel, or know, are alert-able. Bidders should not take offense if the Director is called, because the opponents may have been hurt by your failure to Alert. Since, in duplicate, we are not playing against them, but the other pairs sitting our way, we should not want to hurt them -- they're not who we're really competing against.

Quoting from the ACBL website: "If partner fails to Alert[...], a player may not make any indication during the auction. Showing surprise or discomfort may awaken partner to the error and would be a violation of Law. In addition, a player may not make allowances for partner's error. The auction must continue as if partner had acted properly."

When there has been a failure by your partner to Alert one of your bids, you are required to notify your opponents after the auction is over. However, you may not do so when on defense until the play of that hand is complete. On offense, you must notify your opponent before he makes the opening lead.

Again quoting from the ACBL website: "When the auction is over, the declaring side MUST reveal to the defenders, after first calling the [...] Director, any errors of explanation (including Alerts [...] that were omitted) before the opening lead is faced. A defender MUST reveal any of his partner's errors but may NOT do so until after the play has been completed. A defender (or any other player) who becomes aware of his own error or omission should correct it immediately. [...] in either case the [...] Director should be called first."

Advancing players should know there are other rules about Alerts, such as delayed Alerts and pre-Alerts, that don't generally affect you. Another important thing is that even when you are not Alerted, if you know what the bid means, you are expected to protect yourself by asking and/or by bidding accordingly.

A full explanation of Alerts can be found here: ACBL.

Comments
Search
Pat Clark   |2009-06-26 09:24:34
Gerry Panos used an "old-fashioned" Standard American bid last night that went completely over my little head. We were bidding hands while she was sitting out a round. I opened 1C; as my partner she bid 1S; I replied with 1NT; whereupon she bid 3H.

To you "old guys" this is an obvious showing of 5 spades and 4 hearts. Not so obvious to a 2/1 player who never really learned Standard, who would use New Minor Forcing with that holding.

Anyway, I didn't catch on, and bid 3NT, an inferior contract, since I held 3 spades.

I was her partner in this case, but if I were her opponent, I wouldn't have "gotten" it either. Should such bids be Alerted? Probably not. However, there's a measure of unfairness to some newer players in cases like this.
Millie Dabbs   |2009-06-26 18:57:00
I thought the defending side does not explain the failure to alert until after the hand has been played.
Pat Clark   |2009-06-26 19:03:34
You're right. I have revised the article to reflect the truth of the matter. Thanks for noticing.

Seems futile to disclose after the hand. Why bother? I guess the Director, who was called, remember, could adjust the result.
Michael K. Miller   |2009-06-29 18:22:21
I play a system with many alerts and announces.

Alerting is part of the 'rules of the game.' It is neither a social courtesy nor a ploy to intimidate.

When a player alerts, his RHO MAY ask for an explanation. Literally, the RHO should say "please explain." RHO may not engage in a 'prosecuting attorney,' cross-examination grilling. RHO is entitled to all GENERAL, SYSTEMIC INFORMATION conveyed by the alerted bid. This general, systemic information, at least in name or concept, must be on the Convention Card. It is unlawful for a pair to play conventions or treatments or have special understandings which are not cited, in name or concept, on the Convention Card.

RHO is the only player allowed to ask for immediate explanation. When it is LHO's turn to bid, LHO may make further inquiry; however, the need for this should be rare. RHO and LHO are entitled only to general, systemic information. It is neither ethical nor lawful for LHO to further the questioning in an attempt to convey information to RHO.
Pat Clark   |2009-06-27 13:21:27
Some interesting quotes from the ACBL site's link above include these, emphasis mine:

"To ensure full disclosure, however, at the end of the auction and before the opening lead, declarer is encouraged to volunteer to explain the auction (including available inferences)."

"When asked, the bidding side must give a full explanation of the agreement. Stating the common or popular name of the convention is not sufficient."

"The opponents need not ask exactly the "right" question."
Only registered users can write comments.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
< Prev   Next >

LOG IN

Click "Lost Login" below if you don't know your password or username. To register and gain full access to the site, contact any Director or Officer.